For law firms

Content marketing for law firms, built on your partners.

Your clients are hiring the lawyer, not the letterhead. We give every partner a findable page for the niche they actually own, and we write it for them.

  1. A hub, and the team that fills itSoftware on your domain with a page per partner, written for you to clear
  2. Partners who get foundRanking on Google, quoted by journalists, named in AI answers
  3. From £1,000Per lawyer a month, six month minimum, no setup fee

What Findwell is

A content platform for law firms, with its own agency.

Two things that are usually bought separately, and that only work together. Here is the whole proposition in one line.

The work

An agency that makes the content

Your partners give us their insight, we put it into words, prepare it for your approval and pitch it out.

The place

A platform of your own to hold it

A hub on your subdomain with a page per partner, structured so search and AI can read it.

Findwell

The platform, with the people who feed it

Live in about two weeks, on an hour a month from each partner.

What it is

A page for every partner, built around their practice.

On a subdomain of your own site. Their view, their matters, their commentary, structured so that search engines and answer engines can tell who does what.

experts.yourfirm.com / people / sarah-whitfield
Sarah Whitfield
Partner, Restructuring and Insolvency
RESTRUCTURINGDIRECTORS' DUTIESCROSS-BORDER
Directors' duties when insolvency loomsARTICLE
Quoted in The Lawyer on pre-pack reformCOVERAGE
Restructuring after the 2026 rulesWEBINAR

Step through what the page does

We interview, we draft, we submit it to your risk process. Partners approve. They do not write.

1 of 3

And how it runs

If it stops working, you see it first

A live intelligence layer behind the hub showing partner visibility, audience behaviour, organisation visits and earned coverage. Always available and never buried in a monthly deck.

If your risk team says no, it does not run

Goals, brand guidelines and your house style agreed before anything gets written. Nothing is published that you haven't signed off. .

Where we secure coverage for legal clients

The LawyerLaw Society GazetteLegal WeekLegal BusinessLaw360Solicitors JournalLegal FuturesGlobal Legal PostCity A.M.The TimesFinancial TimesEstates Gazette

What you get

Everything a partner needs, catered to them.

One conversation captures the expertise behind all of this. We handle the writing and distribution, with every piece landing back on their page.

Content strategyWhich partners, which niches and the questions worth owning, from directors’ duties to the Budget. Locked in before anything is written and revisited quarterly.

Shapes everything below

Media articlesBylined pieces for The Lawyer, the Gazette and the nationals, written with a specialist publication in mind and pitched by our media team.

Published, then on the hub

Articles for your hubThe cornerstone pieces that rank, on your own domain. Built around the questions clients keep asking, not last week’s case note.

Lives on the hub

Social contentLinkedIn posts that capture your partner's voice, which is where in-house counsel and legal journalists actually look.

Posted, then links to the hub

NewslettersA briefing each partner can send directly to their clients, a Budget note or a case update, captured from specialist thinking and taken through approval.

Sent, then kept on the hub

VideoA short video of the partner explaining what a judgment actually changes, to camera, filmed on the day of the interview.

Cut, then hosted on the hub

See what your partners would rank for.

A thirty-minute walkthrough on your own firm. We will show you where your partners sit today, and what the first quarter would produce.

How it works

One hour a month. We do the rest.

The whole commitment from each partner, in one picture.

Your partner's hourEverything else, handled

That's it. One recorded conversation and a read of the draft, which is a single billable hour a month.

40 minutes, yours

A conversation

Recorded, with an editor who understands the subject well enough to turn expert thinking into a clear answer.

15 minutes, yours

A read and a yes

We draft content that sounds like them and hand it to your own risk process with the sources laid out. Your team signs it off and the partners don't need to write a thing.

None of it, yours

Everything after

Published on your hub, pitched to the legal desks that cover the practice, then cut for LinkedIn, the briefing and video.

No IT projectRUNS ON A SUBDOMAIN
About 2 weeksTO GO LIVE
You own itCONTENT AND DOMAIN

A worked example, not a client

What a year looks like for one partner.

The plan we would put in front of a restructuring partner in week one, quarter by quarter. The output is clear from day one.

The specialist

Sarah Whitfield
Partner, Restructuring and Insolvency

Fifteen years of formal processes, and almost nothing published under her own name.

The niche

Directors’ duties in the run-up to a formal process

Narrow enough that one partner can own it, broad enough that directors, lenders and their advisers all search it under pressure.

Why that one

1,900searches a month across the cluster, and almost no partner-level pages answering any of it

Pick the nicheStep 1 of 5

Once, before anything is published

  • Content strategy
    Agreed with Sarah and with BD before a word is written, so there is clarity on scope from the beginning
    • Where Sarah can own a practice area, and how narrow she should go. Directors' duties before a filing can be won, but restructuring is far too broad
    • The questions worth answering, ranked by what is actually searched
    • The terms we are going after, and the ones we are deliberately not
  • Biography and partner page
    Not the sixty-word directory entry and not a Chambers submission, both of which are written for a different reader
    • The matters Sarah can talk about, and the sectors she actually works in
    • What Sarah is known for, in the words a client would use
    • Structured so search and answer engines can tell one restructuring partner from another
  • Social refresh
    Its one of the last things firms keep up to date, but its the first place in-house lawyers find themselves after a recommendation
    • Headline and about section rewritten around the niche rather than the firm
    • Featured section pointing back at the hub
    • Banner and profile consistent with the partner page
What we would expect

Live in about two weeks, with no IT project and nothing for your web team to do. Nothing is published yet, and nothing has been near risk and compliance, which is deliberate. We agree what Sarah is claiming to be expert in before anyone has to approve a word of it.

First on the recordStep 2 of 5

Every month

  • 3 insight extractions, one a month
    A single recorded interview, lead by an experienced editor who knows when to push back, is all it takes to build the foundation below
    • The argument Sarah makes to every director who calls too late
    • How lawyers should adapt to the new rules
    • The mistakes Sarah keeps seeing, and why they keep happening
  • 3 newsletters, one a month
    Built from the interviews, shared with Sarah’s network, and republished on the hub so the specialist profile and client audience grow together
    • What the courts actually look at in the fortnight before a filing
    • Wrongful trading, and the week it stops being a judgment call
    • Directors’ duties once the company is in the zone of insolvency
  • 1 media piece: an op-ed
    The first story is shaped around Sarah's expertise, not forced into whatever the media agenda happens to be
    • “The pre-pack reforms have not fixed the thing directors get wrong”, in the Law Society Gazette
  • 5 video clips filmed
    A whole bank of videos recorded in one sitting on interview day
    • The two decisions directors get wrong in the last month
    • What wrongful trading actually means, in plain English
    • When a director’s duty shifts to the creditors
    • Should you keep trading, and the questions to ask first
    • What happens in the first forty-eight hours of an administration
  • LinkedIn, as it comes
    Shared with each new piece and whenever the news creates a natural reason for Sarah to contribute, rather than forced to stick to a schedule
    • A post for every piece we publish
    • A reaction on the days the insolvency statistics land
    • Comment on a judgment while people are still reading it
What we would expect

Indexed within the month. A new hub won't be ranking just yet, and anyone promising it will is speculating. What usually happens first is internal: another partner asks why their name is not on it, which is how the second and third get signed off.

Build the body of workStep 3 of 5

Every month

  • 3 insight extractions, one a month
    The programme evolves with the market: new developments, new client questions and Sarah's response to them
    • What the reforms have done to the market a year on
    • Where lenders are losing patience, and what that looks like early
    • The cross-border question Sarah gets asked most
  • 3 newsletters, one a month
    Each republished on the hub. After six pieces, separate posts start becoming a connected area of expertise
    • Pre-packs after the 2026 rules, and what actually changed
    • When a lender says it is supportive, and how to read the letter
    • The UK director of a group that is failing somewhere else
  • 1 media piece: an interview
    We pitch Sarah off the back of a live story, so she is the name a journalist desk already has when it runs. A harder format to earn than an op-ed
    • Interview with The Lawyer on what the reforms have done to the market a year on
  • Video running
    Published from the quarter one sitting, one every fortnight or so, cut back to a single question each
    • One clip a fortnight, on the hub and on LinkedIn
    • Each one answering one question and nothing else
    • Subtitled, because most of it is watched on mute
  • LinkedIn, as it comes
    Posted with each published piece, and whenever a relevant story gives Sarah something to add
    • A post for every piece we publish
    • Reaction on the days the numbers or a judgment land
    • The occasional short answer to a question Sarah keeps being asked
What we would expect

The first enquiries tend to come from advisers rather than directors. An accountant or a corporate finance contact finds the wrongful trading piece while checking something for a client, and Sarah is the name attached to the answer.

Called before the story runsStep 4 of 5

Every month

  • 3 insight extractions, one a month
    We film one of these while we extract the insights, giving us clips without any extra asks
    • What an administrator can and cannot unwind
    • The guarantee conversation directors have too late
    • What the quarterly numbers actually show, under the headline
  • 3 newsletters, one a month
    Each one added to the hub. After nine pieces, the core questions in the niche are largely covered
    • What an administrator can unwind, and how far back they can go
    • Personal guarantees, and the conversation directors have too late
    • Reading the quarterly insolvency statistics properly
  • 1 media piece: broadcast
    The first two quarters build towards being a trusted source. When journalists need an expert in the same day, they turn to Sarah
    • Radio or podcast comment on a live administration in the news that week
  • 5 more clips filmed
    A quarter three recording captures the next wave of questions without disrupting the partner’s time
    • Personal guarantees, and what you are actually signing
    • Can an administrator undo a deal you did last year
    • The insolvency figures, and what they really show
    • Pre-packs, and what a connected buyer has to prove now
    • Talking to your lender before they call you
  • LinkedIn, as it comes
    The audience expands from clients reading to journalists keeping an eye out
    • A post for every piece we publish
    • A same-day reaction when a big administration is announced
    • The clips, one at a time, as they come out
What we would expect

Journalists begin reaching out directly, usually in the week the quarterly insolvency statistics land. And when a director is searching this at eleven at night, close to the point of no return, Sarah’s is a name that comes back.

Own directors' dutiesStep 5 of 5

Every month

  • 3 insight extractions, one a month
    The final three extractions help us answer the question: what does Sarah want to own next?
    • What the Budget did to distressed deals
    • Where Sarah thinks the pressure lands next year
    • The question Sarah wants to be known for in year two
  • 3 newsletters, one a month
    Including the annual guide, which pulls the whole year onto one page and becomes the piece that ranks hardest
    • Directors’ duties in a distressed business, the annual guide
    • What the Budget did to distressed M&A
    • Where the pressure lands next year, sector by sector
  • 1 media piece: a year-ahead op-ed
    Published at the point when market outlook pieces are being commissioned, with Sarah positioned as a familiar expert voice
    • “Where distress lands next year”, pitched to a national
  • Video running
    From the quarter three sitting, sticking to the fortnightly rhythm
    • One clip a fortnight, on the hub and on LinkedIn
    • The annual guide cut down into a two-minute explainer
  • LinkedIn, as it comes
    Every piece adds to Sarah's presence, with the year-ahead view becoming the flagship piece of the year
    • A post for every piece we publish
    • The year-ahead argument, in Sarah’s own words, ahead of the op-ed running
What we would expect

The cluster answers the whole question rather than one part of it. That is the point at which it starts pulling instructions rather than traffic, from directors who arrive already knowing who Sarah is instead of through a beauty parade.

What that adds up to

12 insight extractions12 newsletters12 hub posts4 media pieces, four formats10 video clipsLinkedIn throughout1 niche, owned by name

12 hours

Of the partner’s time across the year. Twelve insight extractions, one a month, and a read of the drafts. The filming happens on two of those same days, so it costs nothing extra.

Across your practice areas

The model is the same. What we publish is not.

Different client questions lead to different partners. A private client partner and a real estate partner are found through separate searches for distinct concerns.

Private client questions get searched long before they get asked

We work with private client and tax partners, supporting them with inheritance tax explainers, trust and probate commentary, Budget analysis and the client briefings that follow it.

Individuals and families search a worry in plain words months before they speak to a solicitor, and usually more than once. Whether it is a family weighing up a gift, an executor facing a dispute or a business owner planning a succession, your partner is the one who has already answered the question, in their own words, on your own site.

The team behind it

You are hiring people, not software.

Findwell is a product of Profile, an award-winning thought leadership and PR agency. So is the team.

Jordan Greenaway
Every law firm I work with has a partner who is genuinely one of the best in the country on something narrow, and the only public proof of it is a sixty-word bio and a directory ranking no client will ever read. We built Findwell because the fix is not more software. It is sitting down with that partner, getting the argument out of their head, and then doing the unglamorous work of publishing it, placing it and keeping it going.

Jordan GreenawayFounder, Profile

Questions

What firms ask before they start.

+How much does content marketing for law firms cost?
From £1,000 per partner per month. Where a firm brings several partners on at once, that usually becomes a single collective retainer instead, covering the media relations, the video and the wider content across all of them, which works out lower per head than partners bought one at a time. Six months is the minimum term, because nothing on a new hub has moved before then and neither of us would learn anything from a shorter run.
+Who writes it, and how much partner time does it take?
We do. A recorded interview of about forty minutes, then fifteen minutes reviewing the draft. Roughly an hour a month per partner, which is the only reason this survives contact with a busy practice.
+How does this get through our risk and compliance sign-off?
It goes through your process, not around it. We agree upfront that compliance checks facts and risk rather than opinions, because three rounds of sanding turn an argument into a summary of the law and nobody reads it.
+Is this SEO, AEO, GEO, PR or thought leadership?
All of them, which is the point. Answer engine optimisation and generative engine optimisation are new names for one old problem, which is being the source a system trusts enough to name. The hub is the thing that ranks and that gets cited, the coverage is what makes a search engine or an answer engine believe it, and the thinking is what makes either worth doing. Underneath it is Person and Article markup on every page, one consistent byline per partner and links out to their bio and profiles, so the same individual is recognisable across sources. We do not sell the three separately because bought separately they do not work.
+How long before our partners rank for their practice areas?
The hub is live in about two weeks. Movement on the terms that matter usually takes a couple of months, and it compounds from there. Anyone promising faster on a new domain is guessing.
+What happens to the content if a partner leaves?
You own the domain and everything on it. The pages stay, and we reshape them around whoever picks up the practice.
+Can we start with a couple of partners rather than the whole firm?
That is how most firms do it. Two or three partners in one practice area, usually the one with the clearest search demand, and you add from there once the first pieces are ranking. It also gives the partnership something real to look at before anyone commits the bench.
+How would we report this to the board?
The hub has a dashboard behind it covering what each partner ranks for, who is reading, which organisations are visiting and what the coverage earned, and we send a written summary monthly. You should not have to ask an agency what your own programme is doing.
+Why not just hire someone to do this in-house?
Plenty of firms do, and it can work. It takes a salary, a recruitment round and the better part of a year to build the function, it rarely comes with media contacts, and the capability leaves when the person does. We are running in about two weeks and the hub stays yours either way.
+What if we already have an insights page?
Most firms do, and it is usually a firm-branded feed organised by month that no individual owns and nothing ranks for. We do not ask you to switch it off. The hub sits alongside it on a subdomain, organised by partner and by niche instead, and anything on the old feed worth keeping gets rebuilt onto the right partner's page.

See what your partners would rank for.

A thirty-minute walkthrough, on your own firm, of where your partners sit today and what it would take to move them.

Book a demo

See it in action.

A 30-minute walkthrough, tailored to your firm.

The one-pager

Get the PDF.

A one-page overview you can forward to the rest of your team. Inside:

  • What your experts get, and how the hub is run for you
  • Where they get found, on Google and in AI answers
  • Example results and the timelines to expect
  • How pricing works, before you book a call