For architecture practices

Content marketing for architects, built on your directors.

Your website is a gallery. It shows what you have built and says almost nothing about how you think, which is the only thing a client is trying to work out before they call. Findwell fixes that, and your directors write none of it.

or

Written and run by our in-house writers, editors and PRs.

Practice clients quoted in

Architects’ JournalDezeenBuilding DesignRIBA JournalArchitectural ReviewBuildingConstruction NewsArchDailyProperty WeekThe TimesFinancial TimesEstates Gazette
IndustryArchitects
DeliveryBuilt and run by Profile

Findwell works with architecture practices to launch and run insight hubs for their directors.

That means we build a specialist insight hub on your own website, with a page for each director, and then we keep it filled with high-quality, insight-rich content: how your practice thinks about the building types, planning and approvals you know best, not just photographs of finished projects. Your directors approve it and write none of it.

What Findwell is

A content platform for practices, and the agency that writes for it.

The work

An agency that does the writing

We interview your directors, write in their voice, put it through your own sign-off and pitch it out.

The place

A platform of your own to hold it

A hub on your subdomain with a page per director, structured so search and AI can read it.

Findwell

The platform, with the people who feed it

Live in about two weeks, on an hour a month from each director.

No IT projectRUNS ON A SUBDOMAIN
About 2 weeksTO GO LIVE
You own itCONTENT AND DOMAIN

What it actually is

One specialist, one page, and everything that comes off an hour of their time.

01

A page for the building type they are known for.

Not a project gallery. A page about the problem a client is trying to solve, under the name of the director who solves it, on your own domain, with their projects, comment and coverage gathered beneath it.

  • One building type or approval each
  • The thinking, not just the images
  • Findable without a portfolio site
experts.yourpractice.com / people / ravi-menon
Ravi MenonDirector, Housing and Building Safety
GATEWAY 2RESIDENTIALSECOND STAIRCASE

What actually gets a building through Gateway 2

ARTICLE

Quoted in the AJ on gateway delays

COVERAGE

Designing to the second staircase rule

WEBINAR
02

An hour of their time, and a photographer already booked.

We record the conversation, we draft in their voice, and cut it into the article, the posts and a short piece to camera. The images you already have do the rest, so nothing waits on a new shoot.

  • No writing asked of the practice
  • Your existing images, used properly
  • Filmed on the day of the interview
One hour, once a month
Recorded interviewRavi Menon, 58 minutes
Their words, our writers.
From

What actually gets a building through Gateway 2

ARTICLE
From

Three posts in their own voice

SOCIAL
From

Ninety seconds to camera

VIDEO
From

A briefing they can send on

NEWSLETTER
03

Found while the brief is still being written.

Clients search the constraint before they search for an architect: the gateway, the staircase rule, the retrofit standard. A page that answers that is read months before a shortlist exists.

  • Written against the real constraint
  • Read before the tender
  • Ranking on your own domain
google.co.uk
What a client committee searches before a shortlist1,400 a month across the cluster
what gets a higher risk building through gateway 2
AllNewsForums

What actually gets a building through Gateway 2

experts.yourfirm.com

Designing to the second staircase rule

experts.yourfirm.com

a regulator's guidance note

somebody else
04

And quoted when an assistant is asked.

Procurement teams now ask an assistant who understands a regime, and search engines and answer engines answer from the pages that explained it, so a practice with a published view gets named and one with a portfolio does not.

  • Named as the specialist
  • One page, both routes in
  • Tracked month to month
AI answer

Who understands the building safety gateways?

Approval turns on the completeness of the submission rather than the design itself. Ravi Menon, a director working on higher-risk residential, has written on what a gateway submission needs to contain.

Sourcesexperts.yourfirm.comthe trade press
05

And the reporting shows which projects it brought.

There is a dashboard behind the hub: what each director ranks for, who is reading, and what the architectural press picked up. It is the evidence a practice usually has to guess at.

  • By director and by building type
  • Named organisations where possible
  • No monthly report to wait for
experts.yourfirm.com / reporting
This monthGATEWAY 2
34Keywords top 10
2,410Readers
11Named orgs

Gateway 2

82%

Residential

56%

Second staircase

38%

Where we have experience

The areas we have published in.

6 areas we have already written, placed and ranked work in. The model is the same in each. What we publish is not.

Housing

We support clients in housing and residential. The regime changes faster than the schemes built under it, so we publish the practical read on each change as it lands.

Retrofit and reuse

We support clients in retrofit and reuse. The argument is still being won, so the work is the evidence and the worked example rather than the manifesto.

Education

We support clients in education and campus work. Buyers are public bodies on published timetables, so we write to the funding cycle rather than to the news.

Healthcare

We support clients in healthcare and clinical buildings. The clients are estates teams, so the writing is about operational constraints rather than about design language.

Heritage

We support clients in heritage and conservation. The audience is small and expert, so credibility comes from the detail and we do not simplify it away.

Workplace

We support clients in workplace and commercial. The question changes every eighteen months, so this is the one area where we publish comment rather than standing guides.

The team behind it

You are hiring people, not software.

Findwell is a product of Profile, an award-winning thought leadership and PR agency. So is the team.

Jordan Greenaway
“Architects are the only professionals I work with who publish constantly and say nothing. The websites are beautiful and almost wordless, the practice name is on everything and no individual is on anything, and then a client with a difficult building goes looking for someone who has solved it before and finds a gallery. All the expertise is in the room. None of it is on the internet.”

Jordan GreenawayFounder, Profile

Questions

What firms ask before they start.

From £2,495 a month · 3 to 5 experts
+How much does content marketing for architects cost?
From £2,495 a month for three to five directors, with larger teams priced in bands on the pricing page. Every band covers the media relations, the video and the wider content across all of them. Twelve months is the minimum term, because the first quarter goes on building the hub and the rest of the year is when it starts to pay.
+We publish projects, not opinions. Is that a problem?
It is the whole problem, and it is why practice websites do not rank. A project page is a caption attached to photography, and nobody searching for help with a difficult building types a project name. The work here is not more images. It is getting the reasoning out of a director's head, which is the part clients are actually assessing and the part that is currently nowhere.
+Can we write about a live scheme before planning?
Usually not, and we do not ask you to. Almost everything we publish is about the problem rather than the project, which sidesteps confidentiality entirely. A director can explain what the Regulator asks for at Gateway 2 without naming a single client, and that piece will outrank a project page anyway because it answers a question somebody typed.
+Does this replace our awards submissions and press office?
No, and it works better alongside them. Awards win you recognition inside the profession, where your peers are. This wins you the client who has a problem and no shortlist. The two audiences barely overlap, which is why practices with a wall of awards still get asked to prove themselves at every first meeting.
+Is this SEO, AEO, GEO, PR or thought leadership?
All of them, which is the point. Answer engine optimisation and generative engine optimisation are new names for one old problem, which is being the source a system trusts enough to name. The hub is the thing that ranks and that gets cited, the coverage is what makes a search engine or an answer engine believe it, and the thinking is what makes either worth doing. Underneath it is Person and Article markup on every page, one consistent byline per director and links out to their profiles.
+Who writes it, and how much director time does it take?
We do. A recorded interview of about forty minutes, then fifteen minutes reviewing the draft. Roughly an hour a month per director, which is less than most practices spend on a single competition submission that goes nowhere.

See what your directors would rank for.

A thirty-minute walkthrough, on your own firm, of where your directors sit today and what it would take to move them.

Book a demo

See it in action.

A 30-minute walkthrough, tailored to your firm.

The PDF summary

Get the PDF.

A short summary you can forward to the rest of your team. Inside:

  • What your experts get, and how the hub is run for you
  • Where they get found, on Google and in AI answers
  • Example results and the timelines to expect
  • How pricing works, before you book a call